Monday, January 22, 2024
Lyrics from G-IDLE's controversial pre-release song "Wife"
I cook cream soup, taste is Coco Loco
Want me your wife, but she is mm, mm, mm
I clean your room, it's so twinkle, twinkle
Want me your wife, but she is mm, mm, mm
Have a big bite, honey (Ah)
It's bad if you spit out your full stomach (Uh)
I'll give you some more, stop wiping your saliva
You're all grown up now
I knew it, so I just made some cake
But that's not enough, pick the cherry on top
Kiss carefully and eat boldly (Ow!)
Tell me how it tastes (Hey)
I cook cream soup, taste is Coco Loco
Want me your wife, but she is mm, mm, mm
I clean your room, it's so twinkle, twinklе
Want me your wife, but she is mm, mm, mm
Mm, mm, mm
It's a ddub, ddub, ddub
Littlе touch on my tongue
You're so brr, brr, brr (Ah), ha-ha
Ah, you can wipe it everywhere
But don't touch delicate lips
From head to toe, just chop, chop, chop
If you get it now, you should try it now
If do it well, I'll sing a great song
I'm gonna dance beautifully like a mermaid in the sea
If do it well, it would be full for this meal
Swallow it deeper because I feel good
I cook cream soup, taste is Coco Loco
Want me your wife, but she is mm, mm, mm
I clean your room, it's so twinkle, twinkle
Want me your wife, but she is mm, mm, mm
Wife, I make you feel so high
I make you feel like lie
But I don't wanna
Wife, wife, wife, wife
Wife, I make you feel so high
I make you feel like lie
But I don't wanna
Wife, wife, wife, wife
-If it had an age restriction, I might have listened to it as a seriously spicy and provocative song. However, since they clearly knew it was age-restricted but deliberately didn't label it as such for the sake of noise marketing, it's just a low-quality song.
-Wow... In that case, it should clearly be for those 19 and above. It's the worst to think that little kids might imitate this without knowing anythingㅠ Thank you for letting me know.
-The song is good, and the lyrics can be somewhat sexual, but I don't see any issues. I don't understand why this passed the review... Isn't it more of an issue with the review than with the kids??
-How can anyone interpret this as not being for 19 and above...? I can only interpret it as 19 and above; my brain must be rotten.
-Just by reading the lyrics, it seems very provocative... Considering they are a group popular among young kids, it's terrifying to think that they might dance and sing along, not knowing the meaning, just like the "Queenka"
-It's dreadful to think about elementary school students singing along to this song, regardless of the lyrics.
-It looks like they are using noise marketing in this way; they might not be aware of the negative impact on their image
-It would have been good if they had put an age restriction of 19, I'm worried that kids might sing along.
-The song is good, but please don't let young kids listen to it...
An Instagram Reels creating controversy with 20 million views is making headlines in overseas
Summary: A man, accompanied by a boy, goes to a restaurant and expresses hunger. He orders two children's meals, but the waiter informs him that adults must order from the adult menu due to restaurant rules. The man argues that the children's meals are cheaper and questions the problem with it. When the employee insists on the rule, the man decides that his son will eat two children's meals, and eventually, they order the two children's meals.
Controversy arises between whether the man is unreasonable or if the restaurant employee lacks flexibility.
-If I were the owner, I would take orders without much thought and serve. I would appreciate the guest just for coming to the restaurant, and it's nice that the guest can fill up with a simple children's menu.
-If the restaurant says it's against the rules for discipline, you should understand and accept it.
-If you don't like it, just leave.
-The purpose of children's menus is probably to attract adult customers and sell with a minimal margin. There are basic costs such as labor and management expenses included in the children's menu, so it's difficult to see it as selling cheaply just because the quantity is small. If you don't like the store policy, you can simply choose not to buy. It's not about begging for it. If the store loses customers with this policy, the owner will have to handle it, of course.
-Regardless of the controversy, I sometimes order children's food at restaurants because it's small, but most of the time they refuse itㅠㅠ.....
-You should follow the store rules.
-1111 Strange... If you only want to eat as much as you want, go to a buffet or eat at home. Each store has a set portion, and the children's menu is naturally created for children.
-I'm more inclined to agree with #1. The customer took advantage of a loophole in the restaurant's rules to order the wrong thing. Restaurants have the right to set their own rules and regulations, and customers are expected to respect them. The children's menu is for children, and the prices are set accordingly. When an adult tries to take advantage of the children's menu, they are disrespecting those rules. In fact, the dad cheated by ordering the children's menu and then breaking his promise that he wouldn't eat it. In the first place, the kids' menu is priced and portioned appropriately for children. When an adult orders from the kids' menu, they're ignoring the restaurant's pricing policy, and the restaurant could lose money by giving in to all these requests. And I think the employee was just following the rules. If you're just an employee and you don't follow the restaurant's rules and there's a problem down the road, you're the one to blame. When the dad wanted to order the kids' menu, the employee was legitimately following the rules. Rather than being inflexible, she was following the rules.
Baekhyun Solo Concert at KSPO DOME on March 16th and 17th
2024 BAEKHYUN <Lonsdaleite> in SEOUL#백현 #BAEKHYUN #Lonsdaleite pic.twitter.com/QYyaAxL86n
— BAEKHYUN_official (@BAEKHYUN_INB100) January 22, 2024
Jo Se-ho, Currently Dating with Marriage in Mind... Girlfriend is a 9-Year-Younger Beautiful Office Worker
https://n.news.naver.com/article/025/0003336606?ntype=RANKING
Becoming a Father, Lee Seung-gi Vows 'Not to Lose Sincerity in Work'
"To commemorate his 20th debut anniversary this year, Lee Seung-gi is set to reveal a photoshoot in 'Arena Homme+,' marking his return to the magazine after a long hiatus. As a Hallyu star who has received love domestically and internationally, Lee Seung-gi aims to showcase a new charm to his fans through this photoshoot.
In this photoshoot, Lee Seung-gi presents a never-before-seen image, captivating everyone on set with bold styling and poses that differ from his usual demeanor. The completed photos, featuring a minimal yet sophisticated concept, not only highlight Lee Seung-gi's beautiful visuals but also reminisce about precious moments throughout his lengthy career.
Since his debut, Lee Seung-gi has been active in various fields such as acting, singing, and variety shows, consistently receiving love. In a subsequent interview following the photoshoot, he reflects on his continuous activities and contributions since his debut."
https://entertain.naver.com/ranking/read?oid=076&aid=0004100571
CEO of well-known fashion shopping mall sentenced to prison for sexual exploitation and assault
According to JTBC, a 30-year-old male named Park, who was a CEO of a well-known fashion shopping mall, was arrested for filming and distributing illegal videos of 15-year-old and 17-year-old minors, as well as 10 women, and for physically assaulting some of the victims. Park had appeared on various broadcasts and revealed his face, but he was arrested for filming and producing over 200 videos of sexual exploitation from June 2021 to the present.
According to A, a woman who had a past relationship with Mr. Park, "Mr. Park engaged in violent behavior within 6 months of our relationship, and the intensity of the violence increased over time," she revealed in an interview with the media. She further stated, "He hit me with a whip, choked me, and slapped my face. He would grab my hair, throw me onto the bed, put handcuffs or a metal bit on me, and then assault me. He even ran a knife over my body." She also disclosed, "On Christmas that year, he suddenly suggested filming and said, 'If you want to be in the video, take off all your clothes and go into the closet. How about filming that?'" She narrowly escaped a serious injury.
In addition, "In another situation, he marked numbers on the buttocks of two women, including me. I was the second slave, and he treated us like slaves," she said. A also revealed that she was sexually assaulted by a stranger that Mr. Park had sent to her. Mr. Park had given the stranger A's address and door lock password. "One winter, a stranger came to my house. I was very surprised and suddenly he took off his clothes and hit me. He said, 'I was asked to sexually assault you.'" she confessed.
Mr. Park was arrested in September 2021 after some of the victims reported him. There were about 10 victims, including minors, other than A. Mr. Park was sentenced to five years in prison on six charges, including violating the Child and Youth Sexual Violence Punishment Act and the Special Act on the Punishment of Sexual Violence Crimes, in the first trial in July 2022.
The appeal court reduced the prison sentence to 4 years, stating, "He has no previous record of sexual crimes, acknowledges and reflects on his actions." The court also took into account the fact that he had reached an agreement with some of the victims. It was also confirmed that Mr. Park had sent a letter to the female victim, stating, "I am submitting a sincere letter of reflection. The possibility of a suspended sentence is increasing."
1. [+1014][-6] An inhuman being like that deserves nothing but execution. Such individuals, even if they come out after just a few years of imprisonment, are likely to commit the same crimes again. Considering the pain of the victims, there is no solution other than putting them to death.
2. [+572][-3] The judges who presided over the first and second trials for Mr. Park, a former shopping mall CEO who has abandoned his humanity, have a truly bizarre and incomprehensible mindset. If they genuinely felt sincere heartache for the suffering of the victims, they should have sentenced this wicked Mr. Park to at least 40 years in prison and ordered him to wear an electronic ankle monitor for 20 years, just as they sentenced Cho Joo-bin, the mastermind of the "Nth Room" case, to 42 years in prison. Is it acceptable to hand out lenient sentences if the perpetrator acknowledges and reflects on their crimes? These judges are truly beyond comprehension. Lawmakers should create a law to expel judges who frequently hand out lenient sentences, and the National Assembly is also disappointing.
3. [+360][-3] Is it reasonable to fulfill one's perverted sexual desires by committing acts of violence against women? Immediately reveal the identity of that man and publicly shame him. Is a 4-year prison sentence enough for such actions?
4. [+315][-5] "South Korea... the prosecution... the judiciary is truly amazing...... Is it really considered appropriate to give mere 5 or 4 years to these criminals..... Is this really justice..... Unbelievable. When will we stop getting angry and frustrated at these kinds of articles... It's suffocating. South Korea....... F....u....ck.....~~
5. [+194][-2] The court, which showed leniency in sentencing due to the defendant's repentance, should be held accountable if the defendant does not show genuine repentance in the future. The legal system that allows judges to be lenient with criminals who show remorse is outdated and problematic. The era of judges who show mercy to the ignorant masses is over. The court's individual judgment on repentance should no longer be tolerated.






