Which superpower would you like to have?
Not having to eat vs Not gaining weight no matter how much you eat
The answer to that question was revealed today
5
4
3
2
1
Not having to eat, if it means that I can control my appetite.
There are times when I don't know what to eat and there is a lot of food waste I have to take care of. If I don't have an appetite, wouldn't it be comfortable to be able to live without having to eat?
I was so shocked that like a pig, I ordered a fried chicken after hearing her answer.
1. I can understand IU's answer
2. I will never understand IU's answer
I personally choose #1
-#2 because eating delicious food brings me joy
-#1 because I think it'll be comfortable to be able to live without having to eat
-#1 If I can live without having to eat, then I'm not eating. I'm very lazy to eat.
-#2 I'm the type of person who lives to eat...
-#1 You can save more money and time if you don't eat. You can seek joy in other things anyway.
-#1 I want to use the time I use to eat for something else
-#2 but I can totally understand her. But I'm still going to choose #2 because food brings me happiness.
-#1 It's very stressful to think about what you're going to eat everyday
-#1 You get lazy when you live alone
-#2 I live and earn money so that I can eat
-#1 with no doubt, if I can live and be healthy without having to eat
-#2 I feel happy when I eat delicious food...
-#1 I'm too lazy to eat. I have to prepare food 2 to 3 times in a day. It's wasting my time.
-#1 I'm too lazy, even though I love food.
